Raman scattering study of magnetic layered MPS3 crystals ( M = Mn , Fe, Ni)
Wang Yi-Meng1, Zhang Jian-Feng1, Li Cheng-He1, Ma Xiao-Li2, Ji Jian-Ting2, Jin Feng1, Lei He-Chang1, Liu Kai1, Zhang Wei-Lu3, Zhang Qing-Ming2, 4, †
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Sophia University, 7-1 Kioi-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan
School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: qmzhang@ruc.edu.cn

Abstract
Abstract

We report a comprehensive Raman scattering study on layered MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni), a two-dimensional magnetic compound with weak van der Waals interlayer coupling. The observed Raman phonon modes have been well assigned by the combination of first-principles calculations and the polarization-resolved spectra. Careful symmetry analysis on the angle-dependent spectra demonstrates that the crystal symmetry is strictly described by C2h but can be simplified to D3d with good accuracy. Interestingly, the three compounds share exactly the same lattice structure but show distinct magnetic structures. This provides us with a unique opportunity to study the effect of different magnetic orders on lattice dynamics in MPS3. Our results reveal that the in-plane Néel antiferromagnetic (AF) order in MnPS3 favors a spin–phonon coupling compared to the in-plane zig-zag AF in NiPS3 and FePS3. We have discussed the mechanism in terms of the folding of magnetic Brillouin zones. Our results provide insights into the relation between lattice dynamics and magnetism in the layered MPX3 (M=transition metal, X=S, Se) family and shed light on the magnetism of monolayer MPX3 materials.

1. Introduction

One of the current research interests in two-dimensional (2D) materials focuses on magnetic van der Waals (vdW) materials, due to the intriguing physical properties for both fundamental research and potential applications in optoelectronics, spintronics, and valleytronics. A number of potentially magnetic single-layer vdW materials have recently been proposed, including V-based dichalcogenides, CrGeTe3 ternary tritellurides, and CrX3 trihalides. Studies on CrI3 reveal that it has a stable ferromagnetic (FM) ordering in 2D form and a little change of layer-number dependence of Curie temperatures.[15] This has attracted a lot of attention in other magnetic vdW crystals that are similar to CrI3.[612]

Recently, many studies have focused on the magnetic van der Waals crystals MPX3, which resemble similar lattice structure and chemical composition.[1316] MPX3 is a family of 2D vdW layered crystals that have been prepared and studied for two decades. The structure of bulk MPS3 is similar to CrI3 which adopts the monoclinic AlCl3 structure (point group C2h). The layer structure is anchored by (P2X6)4− bipyramids in a triangular lattice which provide enclosures for transition metal (TM) atoms arranged in a hexagonal array.[1723] The monolayer MPS3 has a perfect honeycomb lattice similar to graphene. For magnetism in MPS3, the intralayer magnetic structures are antiferromagnetic (AF). However, depending on the variety of TM atoms, magnetic structures possess very rich types. For MnPS3 material, the AF phase transition temperature TN is 78 K. The magnetic moment is 3.5 ** B[23] and the spin lies in the ab plane with inclined angle. The magnetic structure of MnPS3 in the ab plane is Néel AF in which the spin of the two adjacent magnetic ions is reversed and the magnetism along the c-axis is FM ordering. For FePS3, its TN is 120 K and the spin moment is along the c-axis. In the ab plane, the magnetic structure is zigzag-type AF ordering in which the two adjacent magnetic ions are the same and are opposite to the third neighbor. Along the c-axis, the magnetic order is AF type. For NiPS3, its TN is 150 K and the angle between the spin and the c-axis is less than 30°. The intralayer magnetic structure of NiPS3 is zigzag-type which is the same as FePS3, while the interlayer magnetic order is FM type.[10]

Raman is a useful tool to study the structure and magnetic properties of ultrathin vdW single crystals. Meanwhile, there are several spectroscopic studies in FePS3 and NiPS3. In the previous studies of thin layer FePS3 and NiPS3, two different point groups, C2h and D3d, have been proposed when discussing the phonon modes and the lattice structure.[13,14] However, no consensus has yet been reached. The information on MnPS3 is still lacking. A comparative study of the phonon spectra in MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni) is important for the clarification of this issue. Moreover, the temperature dependence behaviors of magnetism in MPS3 have not been studied or discussed in detail. Therefore, this calls for a systematic research of the phonon spectra and magnetic properties in MPS3 materials with different transition metals.

In this paper, we present temperature-dependent and polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy study on layered MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni) single crystals. Almost all of the Raman active phonons are observed, and the phonon mode assignments are made by symmetry analysis and comparison with first principle calculations. In particular, we conduct a comparative study of Raman spectra in MnPS3, FePS3, and NiPS3, which share identical lattice structure but exhibit distinct magnetic order, and their temperature evolution crosses the magnetic transition. Consequently, we provide comprehensive information on the relation of the lattice dynamics and magnetism in the MPS3 system.

2. Experimental and calculation methods

Single crystals of MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni) were grown by chemical vapor transport (CVT) method. The crystal naturally cleaves along the (001) surface, forming MnPS3 flakes weakly bonded by van der Waals force. In this experiment, the MnPS3 flakes were cleaved from bulk single crystals, transferred on to silicon substrates, and capped with 90 nm silicon oxide (SiO2) because of the transparent characteristic. The SiO2 capping layer does not induce any extra signal in the energy range we are interested in and can enhance Raman scattering signal intensity from the sample. The FePS3 and NiPS3 single crystals were tested on the copper holder directly. The temperature-dependent and polarization-resolved Raman spectra were collected in a backscattering configuration using an HR800 spectrometer (Jobin Yvon) equipped with a liquid-nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) and volume Bragg gratings. The samples were placed in an ultra high vacuum (UHV) cryostat with a vacuum of ** mbar. A ** laser was focused to a spot on the ab surface of the sample. The scattered signal was collected through a 50×long focus-length objective, and dispersed with a 600 grooves/mm grating. The laser power was kept at approximately ** 1.4 mW. We define X and Y axes inside the crystallographic ab plane. X is perpendicular to the b axis and Y is along the b axis. Z is perpendicular to X and Y.

First-principles calculations were employed to work out the Brillouin zone-center (Gamma point) phonon modes of MnPS3. The projector augmented wave (PAW) method implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) package was used to describe core electrons.[2428] For the exchange–correlation potential, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof formula was adopted.[29] To describe the van der Waals interaction in layered systems not included in the conventional density functional theory, the vdW-optB86b functional was chosen.[30] The on-site Coulomb repulsion among the localized Mn 3d electrons was also included by using the formalism (GGA+U) of Dudarev et al.[31] with an effective U = 5 eV. The kinetic energy cutoff of the plane-wave basis was set to be 300 eV. The simulations were carried out with a triclinic cell containing two Mn atoms, two P atoms, and six S atoms, in which two Mn atoms took the antiferromagnetic order. An 8×8×8 k-point mesh for the Brillouin zone sampling and the Gaussian smearing with a width of 0.05 eV around the Fermi surface were employed. In structure optimization, both cell parameters and internal atomic positions were allowed to relax until all forces were smaller than 0.01 eV/Å. When the equilibrium structure was obtained, the phonon modes at Brillouin zone center were calculated by using the dynamic matrix method. The calculations with a 10-atom cell gave 27 optical modes. However, to illustrate the displacement patterns of phonon modes, we show our results in a 20-atom supercell deduced from the real-space translational invariance of the 10-atom cell; as in [32].

3. Results and discussion

The MPS3 crystal has a monoclinic structure with C2h point group (space group C2/m). With 10 atoms in a primitive unit cell, we have a total of 30 phonon modes. At the ** point, there are 8Ag+7Bg Raman active modes. The corresponding Raman tensors are

This leads to different angular dependence of the phonon intensity ** for the Ag and Bg modes in Raman spectra when the incident/scattered light polarizations rotate inside the ab plane
where ** is defined as the angle between ei and the Y axis. From Eqs. (1) and (2), we find that when ** , the Ag phonon only appears under parallel polarization and the Bg phonon only appears under cross polarization; when ** , the Ag phonon appears under both parallel and cross polarizations, while the Bg phonon only appears under parallel polarization.

In Figs. 1(a) and 1(b), we show Raman spectra of MnPS3 at room temperature. The peak at 520.7 cm−1 is from the Si substrate. All the remaining peaks are the phonons of MnPS3. We assign the three MnPS3 phonons that only appear in XX polarization to Ag mode. However, no phonon modes only appear in the XY scattering geometry. In Figs. 1(c) and 1(d), we track the angular dependence of the phonon intensity under parallel and cross polarizations. Surprisingly, we do not observe any mode that reduces to zero intensity at ** .

Fig. 1. (a) Unpolarized Raman spectrum of MnPS3 collected at room temperature. (b) Polarized Raman spectra of MnPS3 at room temperature under (red line) and (blue line) scattering geometry. Inset: the XYZ/abc coordinates. (c) Intensity map of Raman spectra of MnPS3 under parallel polarization scattering geometry as a function of Raman shift and angle. (d) Same as (c), but under cross polarization geometry.

To find the origin of the remaining four phonon modes, we consider a change of the lattice symmetry in the 2D van der Waals materials. For monolayer MnPS3, the lattice point group is D3d. At the ** point, there are 3A1g+5Eg Raman active modes. The corresponding Raman tensors are

In this case, the 3A1g phonons show maximum intensity under XX polarization configuration and zero intensity under XY polarization configuration, while the intensity of the 5Eg phonons does not show strong angular dependence.

The bulk crystals consist of ABC-stacked single layer assemblies that are held together by van der Waals forces. Thus, for bulk crystals, the C3 symmetry along the c axis has broken compared to the monolayer crystals. Because of the symmetry breaking, the Eg mode in D3d symmetry will degenerate into Ag and Bg modes which have similar energies in C2h symmetry. Based on the discussion above, for MnPS3, the observed phonons are: 115.5 cm−1 ( , ), 153.8 cm−1 ( , ), 245.0 cm−1 ( ), 270.0 cm−1 ( , ), 383.2 cm−1 ( ), 567.5 cm−1 ( , ), and 580.3 cm−1 ).

To relate the observed modes at certain frequencies to the specific atomic displacements, we conduct the first-principles calculations. The experimental and calculated mode frequencies are summarized in Table 1. The calculated phonon frequencies are in good agreement with the experimental data. In Fig. 2, we show the atomic displacements of all of the Raman active modes.

Fig. 2. Vibration patterns of all Raman modes observed in MnPS3. The mode symmetry, optical activity, and experimental (calculated) phonon frequency (the unit is cm−1) are also listed below each pattern.
Table 1.

Calculated and experimental optical phonon modes (in cm−1) for MnPS3. The atomic motions of the modes are also given (see Fig. 4). R and IR denote Raman and infrared activities, respectively.

.

Using the same analysis method for MnPS3, we determine the phonon modes for FePS3 and NiPS3. As shown in Fig. 3(a), for FePS3, the observed phonons are: 94.9 cm−1 ( , ), 156.9 cm−1 ( , ), 223.3 cm−1 ( , ), 245.8 cm−1( , 275.2 cm−1 ( , ), 380.9 cm−1 ( ), and 582.9 cm−1 ( ). Near 275.2 cm−1, the peak energies are slightly different under and scattering geometry, which suggests that there are two different modes at very close energy. The splitting of the peak is found at low temperatures, indicating that the symmetry of bulk crystals is C2h. The obvious difference between the two channels of FePS3 at room temperature may be due to the different evolution of different phonon peaks with temperature. The NiPS3 Raman spectra are shown in Fig. 4, where the observed phonon modes are: 132.2 cm−1 (1A , ), 177.4 cm−1 ( , ), 234.8 cm−1 ( , ), 255.1 cm−1 (4A ), 280.7 cm−1 ( , ), 384.8 cm−1 ( ), and 589.2 cm−1 ( ). The experimental results of FePS3 and NiPS3 are in good agreement with the theoretical calculations.[6]

Fig. 3. (a) Raman spectrum of FePS3 collected at room temperature. (b) Polarized Raman spectrum of FePS3 at room temperature under different polarization configurations. (c) The angle-dependent Raman spectrum of FePS3 in parallel polarization channel. (d) The angle-dependent Raman spectrum of FePS3 in cross polarization channel.
Fig. 4. (a) Unpolarized Raman spectrum of NiPS3 at room temperature. (b) Polarized Raman spectrum of NiPS3 at room temperature under different polarization configurations. (c) The angle-dependent Raman spectrum of NiPS3 in parallel polarization channel. (d) The angle-dependent Raman spectrum of NiPS3 in cross polarization channel.

In Fig. 5, we show the Raman spectra in MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni) at 10 K, TN, and 300 K. For all of the samples, we observe that the phonon mode (** 260 cm−1 at 300 K) splits into two peaks at the lowest temperature. We attribute this to the narrowing of the phonon linewidth at low temperature. Moreover, we observe two unusual temperature-dependent behaviors for MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni). Firstly, for FePS3, three new phonon modes appear in the magnetic order phase ( , while we do not observe such additional modes in MnPS3 or NiPS3. This different behavior in FePS3 must be related to its special magnetic structure. We attribute this to the AF interlayer magnetic structure in FePS3, which doubles the lattice unit cell if there is a strong spin–lattice coupling, and, consequently, the zone boundary modes are folded to the ** point. In Mn/NiPS3, the interlayer magnetic structure is FM, and will not double the lattice unit cell. This explains the non-observation of additional modes in Mn/NiPS3. Secondly, for MnPS3 and NiPS3, they have the same out-of-plane magnetism but different in-plane magnetism. The in-plane magnetism is zig-zag type AF in NiPS3, while the in-plane magnetism is Néel type AF in MnPS3. We find that the energy of the 150 cm−1 phonon mode at 10 K is much lower than that at 300 K in MnPS3, which is unusual for a normal phonon mode. The lower energy of this mode at 10 K indicates its coupling with spins, which modulates the self-energy of this phonon and causes the lower energy of it. This indicates that the in-plane Néel AF in MnPS3 favors a spin–phonon coupling compared to the in-plane zig-zag AF in NiPS3 and FePS3. Comparing the ab in-plane and the c axis out-of-plane magnetic structure of the series, it is found that spin–phonon coupling is general in this family materials and different magnetic structures will have different influences on the phonons and magnons.

Fig. 5. The temperature dependence of Raman spectra of MnPS3, FePS3, and NiPS3. The dashed line indicates the softened mode in MnPS3 and the arrows indicate the new modes in FePS3 below TN.
4. Conclusion and perspectives

We report the experimental and first-principles calculation for the temperature dependent and polarization resolved Raman spectroscopy on the lattice dynamics of MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni) single crystals. We identify 7 out of 11 Raman active phonons and the corresponding atomic displacements. In addition, we observe additional phonons appearing in FePS3 in the magnetic ordered state, while there is no new phonon mode in MnPS3 and NiPS3. This magneto-elastic effect is related to unique AF order along the c axis in FePS3, which doubles the unit cell and folds the zone boundary mode to the ** point. For MnPS3, part of the phonons are softened below TN, suggesting spin–phonon coupling in this material. The present study provides the system information on the lattice dynamics and magnetic of MPS3 (M=Mn, Fe, Ni) and is of significance for the exploration of structural and magnetic properties of the monolayer MPX3.

Acknowledgments

Computational resources have been provided by the Physical Laboratory of High Performance Computing at Renmin University of China. The atomic structures and vibrational displacement patterns were prepared with the XCRYSDEN program.[33]

Reference
[1] Huang B Clark G Moratalla E N Klein D R Cheng R Seyler K L Zhong D Schmidgall E McGuire M A Cobden D H Yao W Xiao D Herrero P J Xu X D 2017 Nature 546 270
[2] Wang H Fan F Zhu S Wu H 2016 Europhys Lett. 114 47001
[3] Lado J L Fernández-Rossier J 2017 2D Mater 4 035002
[4] McGuire M A 2017 Crystals 7 121
[5] Zhong D Seyler K L Xia Y Lin P Cheng R Sivadas N Huang B Schmidgall E Taniguchi T Watanabe K McGuire M A Wang Y Xiao D Fu C K M Xu X D 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1603113
[6] Bernasconi M Marra G L Benedek G Miglio L Jouanne M Julien C Scagliotti M Balkanski M 1988 Phys. Rev. 38 12089
[7] Dresselhaus M S 1986 Intercalation in Layered Materials New York Plenum 93
[8] Chittari B Park Y Lee D Han M MacDonald A H Wang E H Jung J 2016 Phys. Rev. 94 184428
[9] Du K Z Wang X Z Liu Y Hu P Utama M I B Gan C K Xiong Q Kloc C 2016 ACS Nano 10 1738
[10] Flem G L Brec R Ouvrard G Louisy A Segransen P 1982 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 43 455
[11] Joy P A Vasudevan S 1992 Phys. Rev. 46 5425
[12] Li X Cao T Niu Q Shi J Feng J 2013 Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. 110 3738
[13] Kuo C T Neumann M Balamurugan K Park H J Kang S Shiu H W Kang J H Hong B H Han M Hoh T W Park J G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 20904
[14] Lee J U Lee S Ryoo J Kang S Kim T Kim P Park C H Park J G Cheong H 2016 Nano Lett. 16 7433
[15] Murayama C Okabe M Urushihara D Asaka T Fukuda K Isobe M Yamamoto K Matsushita Y 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 142114
[16] Wang X Z Du K Z Liu Y Y F Hu P Zhang J Zhang Q Owen M H S Lu X Gan C K Sengupta P Kloc C Xiong Q H 2016 2D Mater 3 031009
[17] Dziaugys A Banys J Vysochanskii Y 2013 Ferroelectrics 447 1
[18] Evans J S O O’Hare D Clement R Leaustic A Thuéry P 1995 Adv Mater 7 735
[19] Frindt R F Yang D Westreich P 2005 J. Mater Res. 20 1107
[20] Makimura C Sekine T Tanokura Y Kurosawa K 1993 J. Phys. Condens Matter. 5 623
[21] Piryatinskaya V G Kachur I S Slavin V V Yeremenko A V Vysochanskii Y M 2012 Low. Temp Phys. 38 870
[22] Wildes A R Harris M J Godfrey K W 1998 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 177-181 143
[23] Wildes A R Kennedy S J Hicks T J 1994 J. Phys. Condens Matter. 6 L335
[24] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. 50 17953
[25] Kresse G Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. 59 1758
[26] Kresse G Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. 47 558
[27] Kresse G Furthmüller J 1996 Comp. Mater. Sci. 6 15
[28] Kresse G Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. 54 11169
[29] Perdew J P Burke K Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
[30] Klimeš J Bowler D R Michaelides A 2011 Phys. Rev. 83 195131
[31] Dudarev S L Botton G A Savrasov S Y Humphreys C J Sutton A P 1998 Phys. Rev. 57 1505
[32] Zhang A M Liu K He J B Wang D M Chen G F Norm B Zhang Q M 2012 Phys. Rev. 86 134502
[33] Kokalj A 2003 Comp. Mater. Sci. 28 155